Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inner\s+conductor\s+migration\s+in\s+Heliax\(TM\)\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:33:58 +0000
Hi all, Looking for the TT brains trust to help me out with this issue: I have two drums of LDF4-50 and one of LDF5-50 which have been stored on their sides for around 10 years. This disobeys one of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00152.html (7,384 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:04:53 -0500
A tdr (without a scope for a visible display) needs to see a step function, an impedance lump. A gentle variance will not be reported well. Comparing a known good length of the same material to your
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00153.html (9,320 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: Dick Blumenstein <rcblumen@centurylink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:12:48 -0400
Not sure what you mean by the "drums vertical"? Do you mean that the wire is mostly vertical being stored on the drums; that the drums are sitting on edge? Dick K0CAT == David Aslin G3WGN wrote on 4/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00154.html (9,733 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: Jon <kd5sfa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:21:48 -0500
The cable is circular...it shouldn't matter. I would think that the requirement to store a certain way is for drainage possibly. _______________________________________________ ______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00156.html (10,522 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:07:14 -0400
I've handled many hundreds of reels of Heliax over decades, and never worried much about that warning, which has more to do with creating egg shaped cable (from the weight of the upper layers) than t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00157.html (9,165 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:55:50 -0400
I do not see how the center could migrate unless the cable got crushed. I thought that the reason for storing it vertically was because the spool is not strong laying on the side and it could break a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00158.html (8,861 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:47:25 +0000
Thanks for all the thoughts both on- and off-reflector. I'm initially concluding that inner conductor migration is not the reason for the 'store vertically' warning on the drums. I'll do a TDR and im
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00159.html (9,357 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:33:07 -0400
Right-O. It has nothing to do with migration of the center conductor, but rather deformation of the shield. If the reels if LDF were laid down gently (as opposed to being flopped on its side as what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00161.html (9,464 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 20:17:58 -0400
Agreed that the main concern has been transportation and rough handling. Fork lift operators are evil people. AVA with it's thinner shield is more prone to fork damage for sure, but it's lighter weig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00164.html (10,470 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Inner conductor migration in Heliax(TM) (score: 1)
Author: David Aslin G3WGN <david@aslinvc.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:06:24 +0000
Thanks Jim. I learned about the DG8SAQ device after I'd already bought the AIM4170C. The AIM is a fine analyser but it tops out at 180MHz so I won't see quite such fine detail. May be time to upgrade
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00170.html (9,629 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu