Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Insulator\s+Placement\s+\-\s+A\s+Releated\s+Thought\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Insulator\s+Placement\s+\-\s+A\s+Releated\s+Thought\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Insulator Placement - A Releated Thought (score: 1): Author: "W3YY" <w3yy@cox.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 00:18:07 -0000; For the record, regarding the original question, I concur with the suggestion to use Phillystran or another non-conductive guy. There are many other good reasons to use non-conductive guys (you can t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00151.html (11,549 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Insulator Placement - A Releated Thought (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:42:38 -0400 (EDT); Bob is correct about the diode effects potentially caused by guy wire attachments to towers. Guy tension helps to reduce the probability of a serious problem, but for multi operator and single operat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00157.html (12,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]