Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Introduction\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Introduction\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Introduction (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:41:05 -0800; There will still be demand for larger hardlines but probably not the economy of production there has been as cell upgrades/rollouts all move to fiber up the tower. Also, fiber to the house (or at lea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00101.html (12,535 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Introduction (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 20:54:31 -0500; Gary-Joe, I'd say 99.5% of the installed 50 ohm hardline base (by footage) is copper. Commscope tried their darndest to introduce their smoothwall hardline (both copper and aluminum) to the cellular; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00104.html (9,262 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Introduction (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 05:40:28 -0800; Gary-Joe, I'd say 99.5% of the installed 50 ohm hardline base (by footage) is copper. Commscope tried their darndest to introduce their smoothwall hardline (both copper and aluminum) to the cellular; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00111.html (9,567 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Introduction (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:39:27 -0500; At my previous house I buried a line of CATV hardline to my tower for a 220MHz packet station. I damaged the first cable and had to be super careful on my second attempt. Luckily the cable was free.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00117.html (8,826 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]