- 1. [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 (score: 1)
- Author: w5vx@hiline.net (Bill Parry)
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:34:50 -0600
- Dear Towertalkians, After reading one of my Christmas presents, DXing on the Edge by Jeff Briggs (K1ZM), I have decided to put up an inverted L for 160. I have a 90' tower next to a 30X50 metal buldi
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00159.html (7,537 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom)
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:27:37 -0500
- Hi Bill, If you use resonant elevated radials, and only a few radials, grounding to the building can actually HURT your signal. Expect about 4 to 8 dB less signal with a small elevated system when co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00162.html (7,495 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 (score: 1)
- Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:27:41 EST
- << I'd recommend grounding to the building and adding a bunch of radials (at least 30) either elevated or laying on the ground. Use as many as you can as straight and long as you can reasonably make
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00164.html (7,645 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Inverted L for 160 (score: 1)
- Author: spelunk.sueno@cwix.com (spelunk.sueno)
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:38:56 -0500
- Agreed. Put in what you can for a ground network and get on the band. It's a great challenge. I have a small (one-third acre) suburban lot and strung up an "L" for the recent 160 M contest. I layed s
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00173.html (9,146 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu