Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Is\s+anyone\s+using\s+the\s+3\s+feedline\s+approach\s+on\s+theC31XRfor\s+SO2R\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:53:05 -0400
No. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00072.html (7,258 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:43:43 -0400
That's what I thought. Tnx! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00074.html (7,481 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:09:37 -0500
We used this antenna in this way Multi-Two with no problems at HP1XX in ARRL DX CW. However, we took rather extreme measures using combinations of custom stubs and bandpass filters. I would describe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00075.html (9,672 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:14:17 -0700
-- Original Message -- From: "Barry" <w2up@mindspring.com> To: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00076.html (9,433 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Zimmerman N3OX" <n3ox@n3ox.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:18:36 -0400
If you modeled this, did you include loads in the centers of the elements that go to other radios that model the effect of the feedlines terminated in the stubs and bandpass filters for the other rad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00077.html (8,861 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 09:45:23 -0700
I believe 5B4AGN is doing this successfully at 1500 watts. Effective stubs and filters are absolutely required. http://www.5b4agn.net/ His web site does not specifically say how the nine feedlines fr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00085.html (9,552 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Is anyone using the 3 feedline approach on theC31XRfor SO2R? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@adelphia.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 10:12:16 -0700
Actually, looking at 5B4AGN's tower, I see only one c-31xr, so maybe he is always doing so2r with three feedlines on the one antenna. www.5b4agn.net Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ . ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00088.html (9,092 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu