Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Isotruss\s+Towers\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Isotruss towers (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:57:22 -0500
Looking through the reviews on eHam there is a listing for Isotruss towers out of Utah. Their web page is impressive but there are no reviews so far. They build non metal towers of space age material
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00254.html (7,391 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Isotruss Towers (score: 1)
Author: kb9cry@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:49:59 +0000
I'm no expert but I'd be leery about a nonconductive tower. Polyphaser specifically recommends against them; probably because of the large potential difference between aluminum at the top of the towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00274.html (7,092 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] IsoTruss towers (score: 1)
Author: Mpridesti via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 20:32:15 -0400
Anyone here familiar with this new lightweight tower from IsoTruss? Regards, Mark, K1RX _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk maili
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-10/msg00031.html (6,755 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] IsoTruss towers (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:41:07 -0400
IsoTruss was discussed on towertalk 9 years ago so it is not new, below are a couple of posts from the archives. http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00269.html http://list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-10/msg00032.html (6,894 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] IsoTruss towers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:01:28 -0400
I have literature from them dated 2003. Their tower then was not climbable, but advertised as being totally assembled on the ground and either walked up or raised with a falling derrick at heights to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-10/msg00033.html (8,060 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] IsoTruss towers (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:15:11 -0400
There is a photo on their website showing a worker on the tower so I wonder if something has changed in the last decade? Having to raise and lower the whole tower for antenna work or having to rent a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-10/msg00035.html (8,341 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] IsoTruss towers (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:39:10 -0400
It's a completely different, way larger design than the original, which was only R25 size with weirdly shaped members. The tower on their website looks pretty robust. One thing to keep in mind with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2023-10/msg00038.html (9,675 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu