Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Just\s+when\s+I\s+thought\s+AZ\s+was\s+safe\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:16:20 +0000
We just put money down on a property and got a copy of the deed restrictions. Pinal County, AZ has no restrictions on ham towers, BUT the deed does have a CCR restricting tower height. However, there
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00884.html (7,757 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:32:20 -0600
Any of your neighbors would have the power to sue to enforce the restrictions. Chuck Dietz W5PR We just put money down on a property and got a copy of the deed restrictions. Pinal County, AZ has no r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00887.html (8,413 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:59:45 -0800
Depends on your local laws, etc., but most likely, any homeowner in the original tract could sue in court to enforce the CC&Rs. There's probably some language in the CC&R document that describes it.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00888.html (9,594 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:59:57 -0500
If it is only a height restriction and that restriction is decent, like 50 or 60 feet or so, I might be inclined to put in a crankup tower. Run it at the restriction height for awhile until folks get
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00889.html (10,735 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:28:02 -0800
The devil in me just has to ask. If an HOA looks like it's about to die, is there any way of getting oneself, or a legal entity set up for the purpose, declared to be the HOA? Just think, someone bit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00893.html (8,781 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Playford" <paul@w8aef.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:52:34 -0000
I was interested in CC&R's in Arizona several years ago and I found that state law required them to be enforced by an HOA. No HOA, no CC&R enforcement. And selective inforcement was not legal. That i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00894.html (8,983 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: "Malcolm Ringel" <mringel@bluecrab.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:25:57 -0500
.....AND, typically, there are defenses available if there has been no enforcement in spite of existing known violations ....but you don't really want to have to pose defenses. As elsewhere suggested
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00895.html (11,450 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu