Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+K8UR\s+4SQR\s+modifications\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+K8UR\s+4SQR\s+modifications\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] K8UR 4SQR modifications (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 00:40:01 EST; After originally being somewaht satisfied with my K8UR style 40 meter 1/2 dipole 4SQR, I was becoming disillusioned and having trouble..the F/B seemed inconsistent and gain was not much over my Butte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00298.html (12,861 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] K8UR 4SQR modifications (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:01:57 -0500; Intuitively, without actually modeling the array you converted to, the heavy radiation is near the dipole feedpoint. In the sideways V configuration the horizontal placement of the radiation was "fuz; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00302.html (15,346 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] K8UR 4SQR modifications (score: 1): Author: k4ja@crosslink.net (K4JA Paul); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:44:12 -0000; Hello Paul You have offered a photo of the modified version. I would be most gratefull to have one. BTW I have a full sized 80M 4 square up but not operational. I was motivated by all your post. It i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00426.html (7,127 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]