Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KLM\s+Balun\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KLM\s+Balun\?\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] KLM Balun?? (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 15:21:44 +0100; While I have our KLM 40 meter 4el yagi on the ground, I am wondering if I should replace the stock KLM 4:1 balun? Does anyone know how these are constructed, how efficient are they, and how reliable; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00311.html (7,089 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] KLM Balun?? (score: 1): Author: ne3h@access.webcombo.net (Joe Shuey NE3H); Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:55:32 -0400; I accidentally destroyed the balun on my KT34XA. If it is the same design balun, there is virtually nothing that can go wrong with it. It is made of a couple tubular pieces of ferrite material with j; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00352.html (8,094 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] KLM Balun?? (score: 1): Author: w4au@contesting.com (John Unger); Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 09:03:51 -0400; Hi Mike - I took the KLM 4:1 balun on my KT-34A apart after the screw for the lead attachment broke off inside the plastic pipe body. The balun is a very simple design using two tubular ferrite rods; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00365.html (8,048 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]