Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Klm\s+40m\-1\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Klm\s+40m\-1\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: Arnie Pfingst <arnie123@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 08:37:42 -0800; I have a chance to buy a klm 40m1 rotatable dipole. The fella said its on the ground. He said he "refurbished it" he has some paperwork for it and a 5kw balun with it. My questions are, does this ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00438.html (6,702 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: dw <bw_dw@fastmail.fm>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:45:10 -0800; The Eham reviews look pretty interesting. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/2816 -- Bw_dw@fastmail.net _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00442.html (8,369 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: Rod Greene via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC); Arnie, I have one of the old KLM 40m-1 antennas and have used it for years. So far it has served me well. They do not normally need a truss support. I don't know what the wind specs are for your area; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00451.html (9,254 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Mike & Becca Krzystyniak" <k9mk@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:12:17 -0600; Hi Arnie, No truss support needed. It's a gull wing design like the older KLM yagi's were. It is a shorty forty so it is somewhat bandwidth limited. As a dipole there is reasonable rejection off the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00456.html (9,245 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:18:38 -0600; A vertical truss does very little regarding survivability in wind. It is absolutely necessary for survivability with significant ice load. It can do more harm than good with ice if the vertical attac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00457.html (10,431 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:31:40 -0800; Arnie, I have one of the old KLM 40m-1 antennas and have used it for years. So far it has served me well. They do not normally need a truss support. I don't know what the wind specs are for your area; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00458.html (8,304 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:43:10 -0500; I had a Force12 80M rotatable dipole which is a bit bigger (65 feet as I recall). It used loading wires that also served as a support truss. The mast ends of the truss were attached to the ends of a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00463.html (11,738 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:59:04 -0600; I helped a friend put up a 4 element 40 M KLM. I am sure that the 1 element is just the driven element of that antenna. We did not have any problems with the elements and there wasn't a truss necessa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00465.html (9,940 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Don W7WLL" <w7wll@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:27:59 -0800; Has been interesting to read the posts on this old antenna and the various comments on how well or not they have worked for those who had or have one. I also have one. It is assembled, setting on som; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00472.html (12,320 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: Joseph Feustle <jafeustle@outlook.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:01:53 -0500; Before moving to my current location twenty-eight years ago, I put two KLM-40-m dipoles on a sixteen-foot boom, built a feed-point match like the Hy-Gain (?) 2-el forty of the time, and put it 10 fee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00474.html (13,573 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] Klm 40m-1 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 23:21:34 -0800; I had a Force12 80M rotatable dipole which is a bit bigger (65 feet as I recall). It used loading wires that also served as a support truss. The mast ends of the truss were attached to the ends of a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00493.html (10,460 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]