Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-500\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-500\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] LMR-500 (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:25:59 -0700; I have a pending 1296 application where LMR-600 would be an expensive over-kill, and LMR-400 would be too much attenuation. I'm actually looking for a certain amount of attenuation to reduce the 30 w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00262.html (7,537 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-500 (score: 1): Author: Hector Garcia XE2K <j_hector_garcia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:38:03 -0800 (PST); Barrie: increase loss is very easy, reduce loss is more expensive. you need LMR-500 ? LMR 500 is close to 1/2 inch Hardline , 1/2 superflex is a little more than lmr400 but a little less that LMR-500; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00263.html (9,448 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-500 (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:48:52 -0500; Some places have stopped carrying the 500 as they have found little demand for it. That's not to say it isn't worth the money, but most either elect for the 400 or 600. Connectors for the 600 are a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00264.html (8,944 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-500 (score: 1): Author: "Barrie Smith" <barrie@centric.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:14:10 -0700; Roger: Those are long runs at VHF! My longest run here is about 125' to my 4 X 7 element 6M array. I use LMR-600 from the shack to the top of the tower, and then LMR-400 from the power-divider to th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00265.html (7,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]