- 1. [TowerTalk] LMR400 (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@prexar.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 16:00:29 -0500
- There are several "LMR400 like" cables out there. I have seen samples from Eu and several US manufacturers. The big difference between LMR400 and RG213 type cables is that at higher frequencies, UHF
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00648.html (7,630 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] LMR400 (score: 1)
- Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@worldpath.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:16:21 -0400
- I have taken the position that since LMR400 has a solid center conductor (like 9913,) I do not recommend using it on a rotating antenna. I suggest running LMR to the top of the tower and then RG213,
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00530.html (7,059 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] LMR400 (score: 1)
- Author: Jeffrey Okamitsu <jokamitsu@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
- LMR400 has a minimum bend radius during use of 4 inches. This tells me that it is ok to us it on a rotatable antenna as long as the minimum bend radius is 4 inches or more - that is, the loops around
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00804.html (7,359 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400 (score: 1)
- Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:43:48 -0500
- Jeff-- There is a big difference between a one-time (or limited number of bends) bending radius and repetitive flexing. I would use something like Ultra-Flex for repetitive bending applications aroun
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00805.html (7,780 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR400 (score: 1)
- Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:48:30 -0400
- Just my 02 cents. Having usex LMR-400 almost exclusively until I started switching over to LMR-600 I'd say using the minimum repeatable bend radius is not a good idea. It'll work, but going with mor
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00806.html (8,826 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu