Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR600\s+male\s+DIN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR600\s+male\s+DIN\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:37:07 -0700; I am looking at this DIN connector for LMR600. What do you think of this connector ? Price is not bad. Crimp style OK, or would I be better off with clamp style ? I will be making multiple runs a lit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00056.html (8,914 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Kevin <kstover@ac0h.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:05:50 -0500; If it comes down to N or DIN go with DIN. I am decidedly in the crimp camp when it comes to connectors. It's so much quicker and I think gives a stronger, more uniform result when done right. As with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00062.html (10,045 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: "Perry K4PWO" <k4pwo@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:54:52 -0500; http://www.l-com.com/coaxial-7-16-din-male-crimp-connector-for-600-series-ca ble I haven't used these but they look OK. I have used a lot of the crimp "N" and they are great. Perry K4PWO I am looking; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00064.html (9,559 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:57:08 -0700; thanks Perry, I watched several videos on installing the crimp connector. Doesn't look that difficult. The crimp style are cheaper too......... Bob K6UJ Perry K4PWO I am looking at this DIN connector; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00065.html (10,655 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 12:50:57 -0500; I would not use LMR600 for the runs to the tower. Even the small LDF4 has less loss, it is tougher, UHF, N and DIN connectors are readably available and if purchased surplus it is cheaper than LMR600; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00073.html (7,341 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 11:34:36 -0700; Also, always consider loss vs frequency when deciding how much to spend on coax (or hard line) for a given run. For example, loss on 160M and 80M is quite low unless the run is VERY long. All of my "; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00074.html (7,975 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: charlie@thegallos.com; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 15:34:30 -0400; I'm running burryflex (150 ft run) for 80-10 (no 160 here), with the last 30 ft of the 80 being "in the air" to the dipole I _SERIOUSLY_ considered heliax, but NOT for signal. Look at expected life; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00075.html (7,501 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:03:48 -0400; I have used LDF4-50A & LMR400 for years. No more RG213 except for short jumpers. I bought a lot of this many years ago and it still tests good. Just my results. Pay for the good stuff once! 73 Hardy; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00078.html (8,837 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:45:06 -0700; What do you think of this stuff ? It sells for about one third of 7/8 Heliax and very close in loss. http://www.rfsworld.com/websearchecat/datasheets/?q=LCF78-50JA-A0 Thanks for the info and advice J; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00082.html (9,447 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 19:46:07 -0700; thanks Jim for the info and advice. Much appreciated. Bob K6UJ Also, always consider loss vs frequency when deciding how much to spend on coax (or hard line) for a given run. For example, loss on 160; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00083.html (9,098 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:38:03 -0700; Do you have a source and price on this cable. Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contest; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00084.html (10,928 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 23:53:10 -0400; It's basically identical to LDF heliax. It's about 1.80/ft from Tessco now. RFS brand connectors are $30 each. I used it to build out a repeater site a few months back, it's great stuff. It's the rea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00085.html (8,316 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:14:12 -0700; NOT identical -- different construction, but comparable RF performance. Note that the center conductor is a tube, not solid. Newer hard lines are built that way -- copper is expensive, and a tubular; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00086.html (9,378 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 00:25:02 -0400; 7/8 LDF5-50A is a tube, this is a tube as well. The connectors are interchangeable for all intents and purposes. I've measured the gaps between the ridges and they are identical. LDF Data sheet http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00087.html (9,824 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:44:50 -0700; Dick, I found it at Davis RF. 7/8" Cellflex, LCF78-50JA, $2.89 / ft http://www.davisrf.com/heliax.php Bob K6UJ Tnx, Dick, W1KSZ On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net> wrote: What; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00088.html (11,456 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 21:46:14 -0700; wow, thats a great price thanks for the info Bob K6UJ http://www.rfsworld.com/websearchecat/datasheets/?q=LCF78-50JA-A0 It's basically identical to LDF heliax. It's about 1.80/ft from Tessco now. RFS; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00089.html (9,061 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 22:22:35 -0700; Bryan, Thanks for the info. I watched a video on installing a clamp type connector on the 7/8" cellflex. Looks pretty easy to do. Bob K6UJ On 9/3/16 9:25 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: On 9/4/16 12:14 AM, J; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00090.html (10,083 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 08:16:11 -0400; I'm signed in at Tessco - I can't find this specific part number and the lowest price I'm seeing is $3.11 for the 50JAA7 (list of $4.75). Gary K9RX http://www.rfsworld.com/websearchecat/datasheets/?q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00091.html (9,322 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:33:02 -0400; Do you have any sort of a discount with Tessco? Without an account they will soak you. I'm seeing $1.90/ft now when I log in. Contact your rep and see what they can do. -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00093.html (8,612 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 10:38:50 -0700; For my Tessco account, I'm seeing the same price $3.11 for RFS LC78-50JA-A7 I found AVA5-50 for the same price from another supplier a while ago. Every "super deal" price I've seen on RFS at Tessco w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00094.html (10,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]