Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Laddder\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Laddder\s+question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:57:11 -0400; Hopefully this isn't too off-topic: After an unfortunate incident involving a large tree limb, a not-quite-out-of-the-way a-frame ladder, and gravity (fortunately, my son and I were well out of the w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00132.html (8,584 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:03:01 EDT; Ah, new reflector.....laddertalk. Anyone want to moderate? Bill K4XS _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00133.html (7,210 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:18:36 -0700; Hi David, I have their "4-step" model (4 steps as a fully-compressed A-frame and16 steps if fully extended). It's so old it doesn't match any of the current models. Back then they only made 3 differe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00134.html (10,702 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:27:15 -0400; I found one of the adjustable ladders is quite handy when tuning antennas near the ground. As far as I can see this is just a different take on something that's been around a while. Go to your local; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00135.html (9,860 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:48:06 -0700; * Hinges and latches take care. Leave them out in a rain a few * times and it'll be a "one position" ladder. Actually, that 30-year old Little Giant of mine lives on top of my service truck, which si; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00136.html (7,625 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@inav.net; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 16:59:34 -0500; A couple of caveats: These flexible ladders are HEAVY. I have a lot of trouble carrying and using the ladder. Make sure you use a brand that has wider steps. My first one had small round steps which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00139.html (9,966 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "JC Smith" <jc-smith@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:04:18 -0700; They aren't light, that's true. The way I like to carry mine is all folded up (duh), and the best way to pick it up is to stand beside it, bend your knees a little, stick an arm between two steps and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00142.html (11,421 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 16:57:02 -0700; I recently bought the Little Giant 21 foot A-frame step ladder. It is adjustable in 1 foot increments and handles 300 lbs. We wanted something to use to get to the ceiling of our shop building, which; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00145.html (8,375 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: John Kuklewicz N7ZN <kukl@mtida.net>; Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:20:46 -0700; I have one of the Little Giant 17' ladders. It is a very well made product - easy to use, versatile, very strong (300 pound rating) and made in the USA. They are rather heavy, especially when compare; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00154.html (10,988 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] Laddder question (score: 1): Author: "David Kozinn, K2DBK" <dkozinn@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:18:12 -0400; Thanks to everyone who replied both on and off the list. To summarize the comments, it seems that the folks who've bought the Little Giant ladders are very, very happy with them. They are apparently; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00182.html (9,236 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]