Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Large\s+Tower\s+Base\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Large\s+Tower\s+Base\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:33:12 -0500; Lots of wasted bandwidth here! Patrick is obviously one of the very few among us with knowhow and resources to get outside the box! Until you work in a few fab yards and around a few drilling derrick; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00071.html (7,568 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:41:37 -0500; On 3/6/2013 9:33 PM, Wilson Lamb wrote: Lots of wasted bandwidth here! Patrick is obviously one of the very few among us with knowhow and resources to get outside the box! Until you work in a few fab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00072.html (8,795 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:05:38 -0500; Lots of wasted bandwidth here! Patrick is obviously one of the very few among us with knowhow and resources to get outside the box! -- Id agree, however, that the proposed foundation piers sound a li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00073.html (7,735 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:09:07 -0500; The bases for those poles (which are really big) were bored with a giant size auger, Looked like a post hole auger on the back of a tractor, but this sucker was on steroids. It looked like some of th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00074.html (7,575 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:19:01 -0800; My PV arrays were on 8" sch 40 pipe buried 8' in 36" diameter concrete (Santa Clara County permit nonsense). A big Bobcat with an hydraulic auger can do that - really amazing. Also, when the auger hi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00075.html (10,423 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:30:02 -0500; Lots of wasted bandwidth here! Patrick is obviously one of the very few among us with knowhow and resources to get outside the box! -- Id agree, however, that the proposed foundation piers sound a li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00077.html (8,462 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Large Tower Base (score: 1): Author: "Patrick Greenlee" <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:44:07 -0600; Wilson, to recap... The original installation was 100 ft tall with a large wind generator on top. The three piers were 18 inches in diameter and 7 ft deep. After spending a few minutes thinking about; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-03/msg00093.html (11,553 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]