Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Laws\s+of\s+Physics\s+Repealed\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Laws\s+of\s+Physics\s+Repealed\!\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Laws of Physics Repealed! (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:48:18 -0700; Congrats on your work, Danny. It's not easy getting good performance with small size! I was against implementing a 80m on R8 vertical back then (1998) due low efficiency and narrow bandwidth. MFJ has; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00237.html (10,973 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Laws of Physics Repealed! (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:23:32 -0400; From my experience with the AV640, I am impressed with it on 40 meters (Its lowest band) mounted at 25 and 32 feet with it matching the center fed,sloping half wave on average for DX. Due to its sens; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00238.html (13,233 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Laws of Physics Repealed! (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:33:51 -0500; My dad (W5JHJ, SK) used an AV640 for a number of years on 40 m when we had a schedule between OK and CO on 40 m every Sunday afternoon. It was up about 10 ft above the ground attached to the eave of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00251.html (14,823 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Laws of Physics Repealed! (score: 1): Author: "ve4xt@mymts.net" <ve4xt@mymts.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:32:21 -0500; The point raised earlier about choosing an antenna rated one band below is apt. I had a Butternut HF6V. On 40, 20 and 10, it was decent. On 80, I may as well have put out a dummy load. Seriously. I n; /archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00252.html (14,598 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]