Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Less\s+Than\s+Optimum\s+Guys\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Less\s+Than\s+Optimum\s+Guys\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Less Than Optimum Guys (score: 1): Author: Wilson Lamb via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:45:33 -0800; I don't think having four guys has anything to do with wire size. Yes, at some angles wire load is lower with four BUT max load occurs when the wind is aligned with one wire. WL _____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00098.html (6,681 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Less Than Optimum Guys (score: 1): Author: Nidhog <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:11:18 -0500; Check the specs for Rohn 25/45 tilt over that uses four guys. Maybe the anchors are not as far from the base. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ _______________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00099.html (7,372 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Less Than Optimum Guys (score: 1): Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 10:07:01 -0800; I think Wilson is correct that maximum 4 guy tension occurs when wind is aligned with that guy. That will also be minimum downforce on the tower. However, when wind is splitting the angle between the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00101.html (8,973 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Less Than Optimum Guys (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 18:54:19 -0500; Unless you have a very narrow lot or a fold over tower than needs to be guyed while lowering, I do not know why you would want four guy wires? With three anchors, a tower can be placed 1/2 of the anc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2022-12/msg00102.html (8,499 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]