Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+Arrestor\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+Arrestor\s+Question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning Arrestor Question (score: 1): Author: Jerry <grf@uneedspeed.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:50:34 -0700; I have a box at the base of my tower housing my DX Eng. antenna switch box that also provides a central entry point for all the antenna cables (prior to going underground to the house). Will placing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00170.html (7,056 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Arrestor Question (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:22:05 -0800; First off, are you interested in "code compliance", in which case there are specific requirements which you have to meet. Most important would be the requirement for a listed "antenna discharge unit"; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00171.html (9,048 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Arrestor Question (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 10:42:20 -0500; Jerry: My coax switching arrangement is identical to yours, i.e., the switch is at the tower and the coax runs enter through a steel box. I chose to install arrestors at each coax where it enters thi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00172.html (10,254 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Arrestor Question (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 12:05:13 -0500; Bill: I agree with you that a direct hit on an exposed conductor, such as a telephone line or coax cable, can be very dangerous, even if part of this conductor is underground. My neighborhood has all; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00173.html (15,405 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]