Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+Protection\s+Question\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: Larry Boekeloo <lboekeloo@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
My new tower is 200 feet from my new (unbuilt) shack.  Should I put the polyphasers at the tower in the NEMA box or at the shack in the NEMA box or does it not matter.  There is a ground cable betwee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00234.html (7,404 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "D Calder" <towertalk@n4zkf.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:23:53 -0400
I have mine mounted outside the shack directly on a BUSS bar going to the ground ring. (Which is also tied into the tower ring) I also have BUSS bars at the bottom of each tower with ground kits on a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00235.html (8,408 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:28:10 +0000
They should be at the shack entrance panel. it sounds like you have a common misconception about the 'Single Point Ground' concept. THE SPG is the point where the cables all come together and enter t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00236.html (8,617 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "John Langdon" <jlangdon@outer.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:52:26 -0500
At the base of the tower with a good path to a ground system at the tower is better. Best would be to also have a perimeter ground at the shack and another protector at the entrance. 73 John N5CQ My
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00237.html (8,054 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:57:06 -0400
Larry: It depends. I have my Polyphasers at the NEMA box at the tower base, but I also have a remote coax switch there, too. I connected the Polyphasers between the coax and the switch so that each c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00238.html (9,097 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:48:04 -0700
And it appears that you might have some misconception as well. That single point must also have a low impedance bond (SHORT, BEEFY) to ALL other grounds in the building -- all ground rods, the mains
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00239.html (8,346 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:53:25 -0700
I disagree (and agree with K1TTT) -- lightning protection devices are protecting you radios by short the voltage on the center conductor to the shield. They cannot do that at the tower -- voltage can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00240.html (8,043 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: EZ Rhino <ezrhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:19:08 -0600
What if you have arrestors at the tower AND the SPG at the shack? Chris KF7P I disagree (and agree with K1TTT) -- lightning protection devices are protecting you radios by short the voltage on the ce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00241.html (8,550 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:41:12 -0400
Earlier this year I buried a lot of Heliax and rotator wires in a 250 foot long trench going from my tower base to the house. The wires were not connected at either end and were not touching the towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00244.html (8,898 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:53:31 -0700
You're supporting the economy, but nothing else. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00246.html (8,144 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:36:29 -0400
Jim: You overlooked my caveat in my original e-mail: I have a remote switch in the NEMA box at the base of my tower. Had I installed the Polyphasers at the shack end, only one coax run (between the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00247.html (11,055 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:28:55 -0400
TT: I re-read this and my earlier post. It may not be clear that the Polyphasers to which I am referring are on the ANTENNA side of the remote switch, not on the shack side. Hope this clarifies what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00248.html (12,885 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:58:18 -0400
That's the way my lightning protection is configured. The tower has it's own ground system consisting of a Ufer that bonds together the rebar, tower legs and 50' radials from each leg. 8' ground rods
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00249.html (12,075 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 00:58:42 -0400
But this still raises the question of "why". As most one here have agreed the inactive ports on the switch should be grounded. That is even better than a lightning arrestor and only takes a few minut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00251.html (14,505 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:22:35 -0700
Gene, I didn't misread or overlook it at all. The function of an arrestor is to protect sensitive (and expensive) electronics from a strike. ALL IT DOES IS SHORT THE COAX. That remote switch is neith
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00252.html (9,515 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:52:04 -0400
Nothing wrong with having cheap "spark gap" connectors at the tower. Worst case they don't do nothing, best case they short some of the largest lightning induced pulses out before they reach your (mo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00253.html (9,014 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:04:40 -0700
Let's look at two scenarios with respect to tower mounted protectors: 1) Direct hit - protector fries (or at least breakdown device requires replacement) or relay fries. Relays and protectors cost ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00254.html (11,291 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:13:04 -0500
Agreed that protection devices should be at the shack entrance. But further to that they should be located on your SINGLE POINT GROUND PANEL at the shack entrance. The whole idea is to make sure tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00255.html (12,330 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 16:17:28 +0000
Of course most of us do have 'spark gap' protection at the tower and shack end automatically. Just look at all the short gap paths on so-239's that are typically used on baluns and switchboxes, in mo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00256.html (11,296 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection Question (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 09:20:13 -0700
What word or phrase might best describe the above-- anomaly, metaphor ...? "close as practical" is variable? "anywhere else is a waste of money" is discrete? I am not nitpicking--just curious! _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00257.html (8,969 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu