- 1. [TowerTalk] Lightning damage? (score: 1)
- Author: "johne tds.net" <johne@tds.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:09:52 -0500
- http://s1328.photobucket.com/user/K0CQW/library/?sort=3&page=1 This is for my 75m dipole . As one can see 75 m is not working ! Do you think it is from lightning? It is from a W9INN 40 75 160 m anten
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00023.html (7,544 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning damage? (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:55:37 -0400
- No, it looks like long term arcing. 73, ... Joe, W4TV This is for my 75m dipole . As one can see 75 m is not working ! Do you think it is from lightning? It is from a W9INN 40 75 160 m antenna. I ne
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00024.html (7,602 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning damage? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@comcast.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 18:20:50 -0700
- Exactly what it looks like, turn the wick down:-) Mike/K6BR No, it looks like long term arcing. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 6/2/2013 2:09 PM, johne tds.net wrote: ___________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00033.html (8,857 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning damage? (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:56:03 -0400
- The pictures are clearly of long term charring - not short term "flashing". The damage is much more like running extended AM or RTTY at power levels above the design specification of the antenna or o
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00036.html (9,650 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning damage? (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:15:19 -0700
- Which first started by a large amount of heat. 73 Jim W7RY Do you think it is from lightning? No, it looks like long term arcing. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 6/2/2013 2:09 PM, johne tds.net wrote: http://s1
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00037.html (9,333 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu