Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+protection\s+\-\s+length\s+of\s+grounding\s+rods\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning protection - length of grounding rods (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:51:30 -0500
Always an interesting topic. I wanted to offer my opinions on this subject for consideration: The system has four purposes - 1) Static discharge to avoid a build up 2) an efficient leader to attract
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00492.html (9,398 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning protection - length of grounding rods (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:06:14 -0800
Number 4 is really where all the payoff is and it's a system of ground points both in the tower area for tower hanging electrical items, at the entrance to the house, and a grounding system in the sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00495.html (9,327 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning protection - length of grounding rods (score: 1)
Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:41:34 -0600 (CST)
" Personally for #3 - I take the strategy that on a ham's budget, we are never going to do a good job at a major strike. I am just going for not exploding the tower base. So I put 3 ground rods in th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-01/msg00502.html (10,208 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu