Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+protection\s+grounding\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+protection\s+grounding\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 10:33:49 -0700; Save your money and put up a simple standard lightning rod (Franklin terminal). Same difference. 73 Bob AA0CY Eric, I have seen a fairly inexpensive static dissipater by Lightning Prevention Sytems o; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00461.html (9,250 bytes)
22. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 10:14:28 -0700; Read the first paragraph below again carefully. This wire would not carry much of the current. Also, if you place it too close to the coax, you can have a flashover. That is why the shield of the coa; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00465.html (12,151 bytes)
23. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 13:03:39 -0700; <199904162316.QAA19069@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717D309.F63E80B8@erols.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html X-Sponsor: W4A; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00468.html (11,753 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 17:35:55 -0400; <199904162316.QAA19069@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717D309.F63E80B8@erols.com> <199904172003.NAA27024@toontown.mmsi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ow; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00469.html (10,162 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson); Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 15:21:41 -0700; <199904162316.QAA19069@toontown.mmsi.com> <3717D309.F63E80B8@erols.com> <199904172003.NAA27024@toontown.mmsi.com> <3718FEBB.A65D62F2@erols.com> Sender: owner-towertalk@contesting.com Precedence: bulk; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00473.html (10,949 bytes)
26. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 16:35:23 -0400; The last thing I'd want around any antenna used for receiving is something that encourages corona, especially when the protection advantages of this device are questionable at best. 73, Tom W8JI w8j; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00491.html (8,875 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] Lightning protection grounding (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 20:56:45 -0700; Actually #0 (1/0) is "light" for good lightning grounding. If you must use round conductors, 2/0 (00) is the smallest recommended. Wide copper strap is still the best choice. 73 Bob AA0CY ex Sr Appl; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00499.html (10,226 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]