Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN); Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 15:41:01 -0400 (EDT); Does it make sense that a person with a lot of towers would stand less of a chance of a strike than someone with just one tower? To me, it seems logical that 10 towers bleeding off energy would be be; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00362.html (7,831 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 16:35:38 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Hi Bill, Ridges are good. Ever notice how lightning almost never strikes nearby a Ruffles potato chip? ;-) Seriously, I find the idea of towers or anything else "bleedi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00369.html (9,196 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 20:06:26 EDT; << Also, you might compare the total square feet of land that you have antennas on to the total square feet of land encompassing the area where you have seen the lightning hitting. It just might not; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00370.html (7,696 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: k2av@qsl.net (Guy L. Olinger); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:40:05 -0400; I keep seeing these (apparently) contractory anecdotes. Assuming noone is telling bald-faced lies, any theory must include *all* the anecdotal material to count. I suspect that there is a real reason; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00390.html (10,815 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 10:33:42; Interesting point .... I've noticed that we haven't heard from any of the big current multi stations about what they do/don't do about lightning. Or N5AU with his 30 (?) towers... 73, Pete Smith N4ZR; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00393.html (8,272 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: n7cl@mmsi.com (Eric Gustafson Courtesy Account); Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 17:01:55 -0700; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> I don't think anyone is fabricating anecdotes. Lightning behaviour is so apparently weird that this isn't generally necessary. I also don't think that the aecdotes are; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00427.html (21,058 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Lightning question (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 17:37:07 -0600; Re: Lightning and multiple towers de N4KG I recently added a seventh tower, 140 ft of Rohn 25 used as an elevated GP on 160M, in the middle of 6 other towers. The towers form an L running from north; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00463.html (10,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]