Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Limit\s+to\s+Concentric\s+Quads\s+or\s+is\s+2M\s+the\s+Bad\s+Actor\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Limit\s+to\s+Concentric\s+Quads\s+or\s+is\s+2M\s+the\s+Bad\s+Actor\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Limit to Concentric Quads or is 2M the Bad Actor? (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 13:38:56 -0500; I have been using six band (6-20M) concentric quads for 15 years now and tribanders for double that. My current quad is a six bander which I modeled with EZNEC before building it. The actual characte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00374.html (9,083 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Limit to Concentric Quads or is 2M the Bad Actor? (score: 1): Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:16:24 -0500; Thanks, John. Nice to hear from you again. You're the only one to get back to me on the subject. I was pretty sure that my guess about resonances was accurate, but wanted to hear the opinions and exp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00406.html (10,653 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Limit to Concentric Quads or is 2M the Bad Actor? (score: 1): Author: "John Tait" <johnei7ba@eircom.net>; Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:41:58 -0000; I have a multiband Quad as you describe Joe. I built (but did not model) concentric multielement Quads for two metres and 70cms. These behaved fb until I nested them into the existing HF Quad. The re; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00447.html (10,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]