Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Linear\s+loaded\s+KE4UYP\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Linear\s+loaded\s+KE4UYP\s+vertical\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Linear loaded KE4UYP vertical (score: 1): Author: Marinus Loewensteijn <zl2ml@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:04:59 +0800; Long time lurker here but I have a question that I do not seem to be able to answer satisfactory. At the moment I have 44 foot doublet up for 80 and 40 and am wanting to move away from a balanced fee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00641.html (7,729 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Linear loaded KE4UYP vertical (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:26:19 -0500; Don't believe everything you read in print. I just modeled an 80 meter version of that antenna, using the recommended dimensions, top wire at 31 ft and 65 ft long, with 82 ft of wire in the vertical; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00645.html (8,947 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Linear loaded KE4UYP vertical (score: 1): Author: Robert Morris <robrk@nidhog.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:57:13 -0400; I got confused with a vertical antenna and "Totally Omnidirectional pattern of high wave angle horzontally polarized Radiation" -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by M; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00646.html (10,284 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Linear loaded KE4UYP vertical (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:09:38 -0500; Here is one solution for matching that antenna to 50 ohms, and also moving it to the CW portion of the band. Make the top wire 88 ft long and reduce the amount of wire in the vertical portion to 56 f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00647.html (10,785 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Linear loaded KE4UYP vertical (score: 1): Author: Terry Conboy <n6ry@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:21:38 -0700; Jerry, Try adding the feedline/pole to your model. When I did this, with a 40 foot vertical run of feedline plus a horizontal run of 62 feet at one foot above ground (and an assumed ideal choke balun; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00706.html (11,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]