Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loading\s+C31XR\s+boom\s+for\s+80m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loading\s+C31XR\s+boom\s+for\s+80m\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Loading C31XR boom for 80m (score: 1): Author: n7vm@lgcy.com (Bill Ralston); Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:44:47 -0700; Anyone ever tried to feed the boom on a C31XR for 80m? I had been planning inverted vee on tower, but this might interact with the 40-2CD & C31XR I'm planning to put up near the top at 105 and 95 fee; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00515.html (8,050 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Loading C31XR boom for 80m (score: 1): Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:28:23 -0500; Bill: I recently installed a Skyhawk tribander on my self-supporting tower. I convinced myself that the insulated elements of that Yagi would not offer enough capacitive loading for me to use it as a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00517.html (11,161 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Loading C31XR boom for 80m (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 21:06:48 -0600; A full size 3L40 on a 48 ft boom would make a good candidate for a matched boom antenna for 80M. A tribander on a 31 ft boom is pretty small. It possibly could be done but the BW will be very narrow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00519.html (9,868 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Loading C31XR boom for 80m (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:28:50 -0500; The elements are. Except I uninsulated the 20m reflector and director. These are the longest elements and will control how long the boom plus elements appear. A careful modeling of tower, mast, C31 b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00520.html (12,040 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]