Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loading\s+crankup\s+towers\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loading\s+crankup\s+towers\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: RCARIELLO@si.rr.com (RCARIELLO); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:10:15 -0000; Hello, With all this talk about vertical antennas let me ask this question. I have been told that a crankup tower will not load well as a vertical do to the sections not being fastened together. My t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00510.html (8,166 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: donhall@myriad.net (Don Hall); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 12:20:50 -0500; Rich, I have used an LM354 crankup for some 15 years with loading wires for 80, 75 and 160 on the three corners. It worked fine in north Texas with two(yes 2) radials and even better here in southeas; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00518.html (7,941 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: ve7hcb@rac.ca (Chris BONDE); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 16:10:07 -0700; I read where a ham, for portable antenna, use a rolled up tape measurer. mm mmm crank slip. Why not have a ring at the top with 4 100ft metal tape measurers attached thereto, a ring at the bottom wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00521.html (9,802 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: ve6wz@home.com (VE6WZ); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:55:43 -0600; I have shunt fed my US tower crank-up on 160m with no problems. These towers have metal-on-metal slides between the sections and I rather doubt there is any problem with electrical continuity......I; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00522.html (9,880 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 22:09:45 EDT; In a message dated 10/25/01 5:13:01 AM Pacific Daylight Time, RCARIELLO@si.rr.com writes:<< Hello, With all this talk about vertical antennas let me ask this question. I have been told that a crankup; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00523.html (11,464 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Loading crankup towers? (score: 1): Author: k3gt@pgh.net (Bob Thacker); Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:03:27 -0500; I use an EZ-way crank up with 2, 3 wire cages spaced 36" from the tower. 160 uses an omega match, and 80 uses a gamma match. Raising the tower changes the impedance, so there is interaction between t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00553.html (9,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]