Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Log\s+Periodic\s+Choice\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:30:14 -0400
Let the games begin... I have a good friend with somewhat limited rotational space ( does that make sense? ...small yard ). He has a yard that does not allow for long boom yagis, stacks, etc. He woul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00180.html (9,436 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:36:59 -0500
The T-8 from Tennadyne. 18 Foot boom for $754 - Hard to beat. Clint - W5CPT - Moderator Tennadyne Yahoo Group - Let the games begin... I have a good friend with somewhat limited rotational space ( do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00181.html (9,956 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Mike" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:58:25 -0700
Clint, this maybe a silly question, but how many elements on each band. I looked at the website, but I could not find. Certainly a good price though. Mike --Original Message-- The T-8 from Tennadyne.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00182.html (11,123 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:23:10 -0400
That's a VERY good question. The XR-5 has TWO FULL SIZED elements on each of the 5 bands, 10-12-15-17-20... - Mike Clint, this maybe a silly question, but how many elements on each band. I looked at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00183.html (12,194 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:30:54 -0500
Theoretically all the elements interact somewhat at all frequencies. However the effect of the smaller elements on the lower frequencies and the inverse of that, being the largest elements on the hig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00184.html (12,853 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:36:21 -0500
I just looked online at the XR-5. Impressive antenna but at that price you could buy 2 T-8s and stack them. Clint - W5CPT That's a VERY good question. The XR-5 has TWO FULL SIZED elements on each of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00185.html (12,925 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:40:06 -0700
All this talk of Log Periodics.....I have a simple L.P. for 2 meter/440....works quite well.. But..on 10, 12, 15, 17, 20 meters, etc........ What advantage (or disadvantage) is there to a Log Periodi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00186.html (10,092 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:38:40 -0400
Band width is great, gain is less than a monobander, and you can get a wide range of bands on one antenna without traps. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ ______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00187.html (11,342 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Edward Sylvester <navydude1962@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Get a Steppir! All this talk of Log Periodics.....I have a simple L.P. for 2 meter/440....works quite well.. But..on 10, 12, 15, 17, 20 meters, etc........ What advantage (or disadvantage) is there t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00188.html (10,491 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Gene Smar <ersmar@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:59:10 -0500 (CDT)
Mike: The way a log-period works is the element lengths are such that a couple are near-resonant on the highest frequency of interest, e.g., 29 MHz and a couple are resonant on the lowest, say 14 MHz
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00189.html (10,242 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:31:39 -0400
Just a small quibble, because I agree with everything else that Gene has mentioned - my yagis are all insulated element Force-12 designs, and they work just fine as top-loading on 160 at low power (~
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00191.html (7,634 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:11:56 +0200
Just a small quibble, because I agree with everything else that Gene has mentioned - my yagis are all insulated element Force-12 designs, and they work just fine as top-loading on 160 at low power (~
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00192.html (8,015 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:36:29 EDT
make sense? ...small yard ). He has a yard that does not allow for long boom yagis, stacks, etc. He would like to have a log periodic, something along the size and boom length of the Force 12 XR-5, T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00193.html (7,902 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Howard Klein <k2hk@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:06:35 +0000
Pete and others, I have been top loading my towers for several years with high power and have not had any known incidents. Currently using Force 12 C31XR's. Maybe just dumb luck. 73, Howard..K2HK n4z
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00194.html (9,191 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:16:39 -0700
For the same physical size, covering the same bands: The LPDA will be heavier (more elements) The LPDA will probably have slightly less gain than an optimized 3 elements/band Yagi. The LPDA might hav
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00195.html (9,691 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:18:52 -0400
No moving parts, no electronics, the only mechanical problems are the same as all antennas. Ice and wind. Yes, I'd agree that the StepirIR can give the best all around gain, but I'd argue that in man
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00196.html (10,360 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Mike <nf4l@nf4l.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:28:46 -0400
Here is Florida (VERY close to the alleged lightning capitol of the world) my SteppIR has not suffered. You can drastically reduce the amount of metal arrayed by retracting the elements. 73, Mike NF4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00197.html (9,843 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Dave Tipton <dave@dmtgweb.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:34:04 -0500
Speaking of LP's. Does anyone have any experience with the Titanex DLP-22? It looks like a really interesting design for covering 80-10. Also... Side question... How do I calculate their 800N figure
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00198.html (10,986 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Log Periodic Choice (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:50:10 -0400
But how will all the SteppIR control equipment react to a large surge from a nearby strike? I would worry that the control box would puke if it received enough static from a big strike either on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00199.html (8,152 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] log periodic choice (score: 1)
Author: jim Jarvis <jimjarvis@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:34:30 -0400
Having owned a Tennadyne T8, and a 3 el SteppIR, I think I can wade in on this discussion. First, although the T8 is essentially a 2 element beam on any band, as others have observed, it doesn't suff
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00200.html (9,974 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu