Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Log\s+periodics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Log\s+periodics\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: wa1dxa@earthlink.net (WA1DXA); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 08:03:34 -0400; I am considering a log periodic, and would welcome any = recommendations/criticisms of what is on the market now and available. Thanks & 73,=20 Bill -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- mul; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00027.html (6,969 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: eisinger@velocitus.net (Bill Eisinger); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:06:08 -0600; I went through a fairly extensive review of the various options available and settled on the M2 7&10-30 mHz "skip log". The M2 is by the far the most ruggedly built of the bunch and, with the longer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00044.html (8,864 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: jhenders@swlink.net (Jim Henderson); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 02:18:48 +0100; Reflectees: Here is my dos centavos worth. Amid much derision and laughter locally, I put up a KLM 7-10-30 8-el LP at my White Sands, New Mexico QTH back in 1986. It was on a 73' 25G guyed for the 11; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00058.html (10,279 bytes)
4. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 23:33:25 -0600; Jim, and closed' the band compared with your friend using the HyGain 5L Monobanders, suggesting you had more signal at the LOWER angles while his signal peaked during the middle of the opening and wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00065.html (13,698 bytes)
5. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 14:10:23 -0400; I notice in Jim's post that he had 4 antennas within 20 ft... probably at 5' intervals with the 40M antenna at the top. I've used the 105/155/205 and would expect that antennas this close would not b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00071.html (7,074 bytes)
6. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: jhenders@swlink.net (Jim Henderson); Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 19:18:32 +0100; Negative. First, they were not mine, they were K7UP's. Second, they were on 2 towers, 100 feet apart. As I recall, the 40 KLM and 10m 5el were about 18 ft apart on one tower, with the 10m above the 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00072.html (7,720 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] LOG PERIODICS (score: 1): Author: franknorton@home.com (Frank Norton); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:52:53 -0400; hi all, i too am considering a tennadyve or other brand of log periodic, any input would be appreciated! Thanks All. 73 de, Frank kb8xu List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this su; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00542.html (6,999 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] LOG PERIODICS (score: 1): Author: billwall@bellsouth.net (bill wall); Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 17:50:29 -0400; Hi TT's; I think on LPY's it would be wise to contact K4EWG, Pete Rhodes. He published many articles on LPY's. He had a world class LPY station for many years. Living today I do not believe there is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00544.html (8,425 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Log periodics (score: 1): Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:02:39 -0400; For me, major drawbacks for the log periodic is the extra weight and windload most of them have, due to so many elements, and the huskier boom required to carry all the elements. At least compared to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00518.html (7,457 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]