Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Long\s+wire\s+\-\s+remote\s+tuner\s+\-\s+radials\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 02:15:53 -0400
All, I have an ICOM AH-4 remote tuner that I'm going to mount remotely inside a shed that's 20 feet from the shack. I plan on using 100 feet or so of wire in an L configuration. The vertical section
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00120.html (7,029 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:00:21 -0700
No question -- wrapping wire around a shed does NOT form a radial. One radial that is more or less straight is far better than none, but if I were you, I would try to figure out how to run a lot more
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00123.html (8,635 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: "John Frazier" <fraz1@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:59:07 -0500
Hi Tony..... If you can only do one, I'd take the easiest method to install. But, if you can do either, why not do both? John W4II _______________________________________________ ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00124.html (6,862 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:05:08 +0100
Jim, I thought he said 100ft ? 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00125.html (7,027 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: WA8JXM <wa8jxm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:05:40 -0400
That depends on what distances you are trying to work. 200-600 miles, the horizontal part may provide the most useful radiation. My ARRL Antenna Book suggests 160-170' feet may be the easiest to load
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00126.html (8,633 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:29:48 -0700
Nothing wrong with how they work ... lots wrong in terms of the relative difficulty to feed them. Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00128.html (8,187 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:30:51 -0700
Now that I do back and read it again, you're right! Sorry Tony -- I think what you've described will work fine if you adjust your plans for radials. :) 73, Jim K9YC __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00129.html (8,032 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:18:11 -0700
Yes, but he wants to use it on 160, 80, 40, and 30M, and he wants to use a remotely located auto tuner to match it. That makes any multiple of half waves VERY difficult to feed with an off-the-shelf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00130.html (8,323 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Long wire - remote tuner - radials (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:44:50 -0700
OTOH, a multiple of a half wave will not be dependent on radials, if you are radial challenged. In that case, 130 feet might make sense. It will be a high impedance on 80 and 40 and low Z on 160. Use
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00131.html (8,807 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu