Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loss\s+in\s+CCS\s+conductors\s+at\s+low\s+freqs\s+\(was\s+Voltage\s+Breakdown\s+For\s+Enameled\s+Wire\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:36:37 -0800
It just so happens that I've been working with a fellow who has been measuring loss in Wireman 551 (aka JSC 1318) window line. The conductors are solid #18 CCS. Using a DG8SAQ VNWA in 1-port mode, he
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00310.html (8,083 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:08:02 -0800
On 1/29/18 2:36 PM, Dan Maguire wrote: Jim Brown wrote: ,,, but the steel causes losses to increase at lower frequencies as compared to copper or silver coated copper. It just so happens that I've be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00311.html (9,231 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Loss in CCS conductors at low freqs (was Voltage Breakdown For Enameled Wire) (score: 1)
Author: Dan Maguire <danac6la@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:18:43 -0800
Done. https://postimg.org/image/u8sa9sxol/ Dan, AC6LA _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2018-01/msg00314.html (7,342 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu