Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Low\s+Loss\s+400\,\s+You\s+get\s+what\s+you\s+pay\s+for\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Davis -Davis RF Co." <sdavis@davisrf.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:39:22 -0400
Hi Alfredo, Times Microwave LMR 400 has been around for many years (at least 30 that I can remember). It is a fine cable, made in USA (some China production now but Times indicates that is not for US
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00666.html (10,871 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:46:47 -0700
Amplifying on Steve's comments a bit.. You might also ask the vendor how they verify that it meets the spec sheet. It's not unheard of for someone to publish a spec sheet that is effectively "designe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00678.html (8,388 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: Adam Shirley WJ4X <wj4x@amsat.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:52:32 -0400
I also would throw Bury Flex in the running, it's what I use for everything 440 and down. I have a run of Jefe 400, and it works well on HF, but as far as measured spec, I have no clue, but it does a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00680.html (9,756 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:23:06 -0400
Alfredo, I bought a couple of rolls of the BURY FLEX here when I moved down to Florida in 1998. I ran this cable from the operating position, through the attic, and outside, into a cabinet with Poly
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00682.html (12,381 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:44:18 -0400
I use it for rotator loops and from the remote switches to the sloping dipoles, but no breaks between the shack and antenna? I have the pigtails that run from the rigs to the patch panels (2 connecto
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00684.html (9,118 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:00:50 -0400
I'll bet it gets closer to 140 in those attics as we get well over 120 up here in the frozen North<:-)) There is LMR-600 and then there is LMR 600 Ultraflex. The UF has a very fragile rubber like jac
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00686.html (10,167 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Low Loss 400, You get what you pay for (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:24:08 -0700
Steve has given you excellent advice. Furthermore, there are MANY specifications for a good cable. Loss is only one of them. All of the physical construction details that Steve has discussed, and man
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00694.html (8,615 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu