Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Low\s+Loss\s+Coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Low\s+Loss\s+Coax\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: jperalta@tampabay.rr.com (Julio); Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:41:04 -0500; I just re-installed my 89' crank-up tower after being off the air for about 6 years. I would like to ask the group what should I consider for low loss coax. Taking into consideration the problems wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00199.html (8,368 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: nwtncc@iswt.com (James Hall); Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 18:07:47 -0600; Hi Julio: I used LMR-600 for my long runs that are relatively straight and BuryFlex (9914) up the tower and close to the radios. Works like a champ ! Jamie WB4YDL To: <towertalk@contesting.com> _____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00200.html (9,850 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:11:42 -0500; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> about loss the room so higher ________________________________________________________________________ This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you buy pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00203.html (11,321 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: george.shaw@ukf.net (George Shaw); Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:45:54 -0000; I have been looking at a lot of coax specs and talking to a lot of people about it. From what I see two stand out in the "flexible" area Westflex 103 and Buryflex 9914. Straight runs benefit from LM-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00204.html (13,379 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:33:58 EST; It's typically six times the diameter so the minimum bending radius for 1/2" coax would be three inches. I probably wouldn't stress foam-filled coax that much due to the potential for foam cold-flow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00205.html (8,912 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: nwtncc@iswt.com (James C. Hall, M.D.); Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 11:16:37 -0600; Hi George: I tinkered around with the same sort of thing here with LMR-600. In the HF frequencies, there is VERY little loss with or without angle pieces. The minimum bending radius with LMR-600 is 4; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00207.html (15,849 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L Martin); Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:06:21 -0600; Is it OK to fit a 90 degree connector? What sort of George (and others), (I have been waiting and waiting for someone to ask that question) This is from the April 1988 Bullsheet, newsletter of the Te; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00224.html (10,386 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: w7ry@earthlink.net (james Colville); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:48:38 +0800; Andrew has a specification on how much of a vertical run you can support. Please use the Andrew hoisting grips. As I remember 1/2 inch LDF should be supported every 100 feet. You can support the vert; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00230.html (10,903 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:49:57 -0500; I have a run of inch & 1/4 hard line up my 80' tower. When got it up and clamped down at the top, was very surprised to see how much it whipped around in the wind. I wound up clamping it to the tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00233.html (12,618 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Low Loss Coax (score: 1): Author: teamw@quixnet.net (John & Margaret Weatherley); Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 08:59:27 -0500; IF you decide to use a 90 degree UHF adaptor be VERY careful in your choice. Make sure you choose a brand name item such as Amphenol etc. A few years ago I needed some for a commercial project and ha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00234.html (9,242 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]