Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MA5B\s+without\s+the\s+WARC\s+dipole\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MA5B\s+without\s+the\s+WARC\s+dipole\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MA5B without the WARC dipole (score: 1): Author: "Richard Hill" <REHill@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:45:43 -0800; I'm considering installing a MA5B two element beam without the WARC dipole. Anyone try it and then what changes from standard lengths were necessary? What results? I've heard that 10m does not load w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00649.html (7,006 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] MA5B without the WARC dipole (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:32:49 -0600; Um, the MA5B is a three-element design with limited capability on WARC bands. I've got one. I've not heard of a WARC dipole accessory, nor is a WARC dipole a distinguishable part from the MA5B. We ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00657.html (8,394 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]