Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\-\s+vs\s+GAP\-\s+No\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\-\s+vs\s+GAP\-\s+No\s+Contest\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MFJ- vs GAP- No Contest (score: 1): Author: Dinsterdog@aol.com (Dinsterdog@aol.com); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 21:48:04 EDT; Please, the Gap gets all this guff yet, in reality, there is only one company, over the years, who makes the worse of the worse, who deserves the criticism, and above all, is the definition of "trash; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00221.html (7,658 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] MFJ- vs GAP- No Contest (score: 1): Author: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn); Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 19:30:03 -0700; Paul: have you checked out eHam.net . They have a good product review section as well as many other excellent and unique features. 73, Dan, N5AR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00223.html (8,567 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] MFJ- vs GAP- No Contest (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 22:59:31 -0400; Well said, Mighthy Fine Junk. (MFJ, get it ?) You can always enter your comments on www.eham.net for product reviews, good or bad. advertising" backyard products, my should start product -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00225.html (7,974 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] MFJ- vs GAP- No Contest (score: 1): Author: JimW9WU@aol.com (JimW9WU@aol.com); Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 15:31:54 EDT; One of the only problems with eham is that they publish equipment/antenna reviews from the uneducated, ill-informed, etc. Dinsterdog claims an MFJ antenna almost burned his house down? Fantastic! How; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00243.html (7,603 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]