Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\-259B\s+vs\.\s+MFJ\-269\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\-259B\s+vs\.\s+MFJ\-269\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MFJ-259B vs. MFJ-269 (score: 1): Author: Juha Rantanen <oh6xx@sral.fi>; Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 21:56:45 +0300; Hi all, I have been going through the net without getting a really clear answer what is the difference between MFJ-259B and MFJ-269. The 269 has UHF and higher price tag but are those the only differ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00103.html (6,801 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] MFJ-259B vs. MFJ-269 (score: 1): Author: Juha Rantanen <oh6xx@sral.fi>; Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 13:50:16 +0300; Hi all, I have been going through the net without getting a really clear answer what is the difference between MFJ-259B and MFJ-269. The 269 has UHF and higher price tag but are those the only differ; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00107.html (7,271 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ-259B vs. MFJ-269 (score: 1): Author: "Hsu, Aaron (NBC Universal)" <aaron.hsu@nbcuni.com>; Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 15:30:50 -0700; IIRC, the main diffs between the '259 and '269 are the A/D converters (8-bit vs 12-bit) and the addition of 70cm on the '269. I also found this reference on MFJ's product info page for the '269... "Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00110.html (9,197 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ-259B vs. MFJ-269 (score: 1): Author: "J.Hector Garcia M" <Hector@telecom1.net>; Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 17:19:31 -0700; Juha: there are other options for antenna analizers, you can check the QST may 2005, there you can find the diferences in all the comercial brands . for my point of view , if you don't need the UHF ,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00137.html (9,099 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] MFJ-259B vs. MFJ-269 (score: 1): Author: "Kristinn Andersen" <andersen@simnet.is>; Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 22:16:35 -0000; One more difference between the two models: The 269 offers you to view the impedance as resistance IN PARALLEL WITH the reactance, not only the SERIAL connections of these two. This is practical wher; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00371.html (7,356 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]