Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\s+259\s+vs\s+259B\s+\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MFJ\s+259\s+vs\s+259B\s+\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MFJ 259 vs 259B ?? (score: 1): Author: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@infoblvd.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 14:15:12 -0400; Gentlemen: Looking for a short answer as to the differences/advantages of the (older) MFJ259 vs the 259B. What really is different and/or better, if anything? This likely has been addressed in the ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00219.html (6,770 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ 259 vs 259B ?? (score: 1): Author: "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:13:29 -0600; CAUTION -- second-hand information! I have a 259B, and have never personally seen or used an original 259. Having given that caveat -- a friend of mine has one, and he told me that one principle diff; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00223.html (8,907 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ 259 vs 259B ?? (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 16:11:52 -0700 (PDT); I have a 259B that was given to me. The reason was that it does not give the sign of the impedance. The circuits (they were not antennas) the original owners were measuring were such that the sign wa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00224.html (8,172 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ 259 vs 259B ?? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:23:56 -0400; have never personally a friend of mine has the 259 doesn't show net Z and SWR. Actually the 259 doesn't even read Z. It reads R but only when reactance is zero. The 259B has the ability to do dozens; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00254.html (8,928 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]