Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Maximum\s+Wind\s+Load\s+on\s+Rohn\s+45G\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Maximum\s+Wind\s+Load\s+on\s+Rohn\s+45G\s+Towers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Maximum Wind Load on Rohn 45G Towers (score: 1): Author: x703jko@starpower.net (Jeffrey Okamitsu); Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 21:13:16 -0400; Thanks for reading this email. I am in the process of putting up two 130 foot Rohn 45G towers as per Rohn's 90 mph specifications. Maximum allowable projected area at the top of the tower, as specifi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00478.html (7,895 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Maximum Wind Load on Rohn 45G Towers (score: 1): Author: pringle50@home.com (pringle50@home.com); Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:41:25 -0500; I believe that may be a giant leap you are making to assume that the top of the 45G will support 20 square feet in a 90 mph condition. If you are going to make a leap like that, why did you not addre; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00484.html (9,743 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Maximum Wind Load on Rohn 45G Towers (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 06:24:30 -0600; IF you plan on putting more than one antenna on your mast, you would be well advised to place your top set of guys closer to the TOP of the tower. The new Rohn catalog assumes you need an 8 ft cleara; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00508.html (8,017 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]