Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Medical\s+offices\s+near\s+possible\s+new\s+club\s+site\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Cal Zethmayr <w4gmh@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:59:01 -0500
Our North Okaloosa Amateur Radio Club (NOARC) is about to purchase a small (.3 of an acre) piece of land (mortgage company owned) at a very good price. There is a MD's office about 100 feet from this
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00288.html (8,632 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:11:15 +0000
Local jurisdictions have NO authority to regulate RFI. That authority belongs exclusively to the federal government. A zoning change denial that incorporates potential RFI issues into the decision wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00289.html (10,044 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 09:12:42 -0700
Hi Cal. I would be quite concerned about RF trash from equipment in those medical offices. It's likely to be considered Industrial by FCC, making it subject only Part 15 Class A standards, which allo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00292.html (8,100 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wynn via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 10:26:10 -0700
A few years ago, I was the assistant county attorney for a county here in Georgia.  We had a zoning board member that would always try and bring that issue up.  He was one of the yahoos  that actuall
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00299.html (11,791 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:13:34 -0400
Quite aside from the legal or technical merits, a lawsuit involving services gone wrong at either office could easily ensnare your club. Even if the claims are baseless, you could be in for tens of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00302.html (10,419 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:28:50 -0700
Cal Has anyone taken a good SW receiver to the property with a reasonable HF antenna and listened to the local noise level at different times? Part 15 diathermy machines are said to be the worst RFI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00304.html (11,966 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:05:57 -0300
Cal, I work at a hospital. I am also an active ham with an HF+VHF mobile setup I use in the parking lot at the hospital for CWT contests at least once a week. (mostly on 20m) In sunspot peak years I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00307.html (10,315 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:28:51 -0500
Intended as mostly humorous mostly off topic digression... As a young lad who could only afford really cheap super regen receivers for an RC airplane operating on CB freqs I really hated it when the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00309.html (13,350 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 13:54:18 -0700
UL and CSA are SAFETY Testing Standards ONLY. The test products to show that 1) they cannot start a fire and 2) they do not provide an opportunity for electrical shock. In the case of wiring, they al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00310.html (9,644 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:37:23 -0300
Jim is of course correct and I made the fatal error of getting interrupted when I wrote that last email and failed to finish my train of thought when I came back to sit down and type. I'm actually em
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00312.html (11,451 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:41:59 -0500
I agree. I live 1/4 mile from two big hospitals and I get all kinds of garbage. I can't imagine trying to trace that kind of thing down. You might consider if they have MRI machines with 8877s in the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00313.html (10,033 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Medical offices near possible new club site (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 19:54:12 -0400
"In the old days<:-), probably about when you had your experiences, my late boss (a ham), from many, many years ago used 6 meters to get away from the CB crowd, BUT 6-meters was not without its hazar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00314.html (16,297 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu