Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MicroDEM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+MicroDEM\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] MicroDEM (score: 1): Author: "SJ W3TX" <superberthaguy@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:25:51 -0500; Has anyone figured out how to set-up MicroDEM so that when you pull up the DEM file it displays the topographic lines? I'm hunting for a new hilltop location, and that feature sure would help. Also,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00318.html (7,230 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] MicroDEM (score: 1): Author: "Frank Donovan" <donovanf@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:01:31 -0500; Scott, If you're willing to use towers over 100 feet tall, there's not a reason in the world why a QTH with relatively flat terrain cannot be fully competitive with a hilltop QTH. I realize that flat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00326.html (9,250 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] MicroDEM (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:48:23 -0500; 200ft hill that gradually rises the +200ft over 2 miles toward EU has a better low angle coverage that the same antenna system on the top of a 50ft hill that gradually falls -50ft over 2 miles toward; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00330.html (7,639 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]