Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mini\s+Quad\s+vs\s+other\s+small\s+beams\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mini\s+Quad\s+vs\s+other\s+small\s+beams\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mini Quad vs other small beams (score: 1): Author: John <af5cc@fidmail.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:23:03 -0500; How does the TGM miniquad (or mini products miniquad) compare to other small beams like the Cushcraft MA5B, Mosley Mini32, and Butternut HF5B in terms of performance? I like the idea of the miniquad; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00076.html (6,729 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mini Quad vs other small beams (score: 1): Author: Alex Malyava <alex.k2bb@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:48:38 -0400; I have their MQ-26 beam - 2 elements / 6 bands. pros: small turning radius, 6 bands, acceptable diagram @ 15 and up cons: would not handle full power, the diagram @ 20m is almost circular, 20/15 band; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00077.html (7,955 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]