Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Minimum\s+Discernible\s+Difference\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:15:46 -0700
I've added a page to my web site covering some investigations into how much difference in signal strength might be noticeable in weak signal and/or contest conditions, with several audio files includ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00475.html (7,579 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:43:54 -0700
The intent of these tests is good. It is always good to get confirmation that a 2 dB difference in S/N is significant. That's why I run 150W in low power contests instead of 100W, if the rules permit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00476.html (9,054 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:57:53 -0700
Hi Dave, I didn't listen, but I did read, and I think both your methodoloy and conclusions make sense. One thing I WOULD change though is to work in the WAV format rather than MP3. 16 bit 8 kHz is en
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00478.html (10,278 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:12:16 -0700
Thanks for the feedback, Rick ... good comments. I wasn't really trying to simulate what happens in a receiver, though, because there is no way I can account for all the various receiver characterist
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00480.html (10,789 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:31:27 -0700
Creeping senility is such an ugly thing .... While working outside on a project I realized I had referred to K9YC as Gary, when everyone (including me) knows his name is Jim. My sincere apologies ...
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00482.html (12,311 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:43:45 -0700
No problem. Actually, I know some Garys who are OK! :) 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00483.html (8,042 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:52:15 -0500
Don't sound so bad, if you call it "Senior Moments". 73's Jim W5IFP _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00484.html (8,082 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Richard M. Gillingham" <rmoodyg@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:51:05 -0400
I call it the CRS syndrome... Can't Remember S--! I have not infrequent episodes of it.. 73 Gil, W1RG -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00485.html (9,190 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:54:33 -0400
Tis qute alright Sam!. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00488.html (13,318 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu