Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Modeling\s+Ladderline\s+as\s+an\s+Antenna\s+Element\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:32:39 -0400
I am thinking about using ladderline for a folded dipole or for linear loading a wire antenna. I wonder if anyone has successfully modeled ladderline and, if so, what parameters they used for the ins
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00744.html (7,132 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 15:38:26 -0700
what program are you using to model it? If NEC, insulation models assume uniform thickness around the conductor, which is not representative of ladder line, so the "fine scale" details of the field i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00745.html (8,746 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:12:34 -0400
In a folded dipole currents and voltages are essentially in parallel. No need to model it near resonance because the line is all common mode so the dielectric has little effect except for making the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00749.html (8,536 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:05:43 -0400
Jim and Tom, many thanks for your replies. Let me tell you what I'm up to. I would like to put up an 80M EDZ between two towers. However, my towers are only 300' apart and I need about 340'. I have c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00767.html (11,205 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: "Mark ." <n1lo@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:41:54 -0400
Joe, How about capacitive end loading for shortening your antenna? As far as I know, it's the most efficient type of loading. You could let the ends droop and attach basic spoke and perimeter wire ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00775.html (9,402 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:02:09 -0700
I'd try approximating it as a couple insulated wires with insulation thickness comparable to the average thickness and see where it gets you. Then, try changing the thickness a bit and see if it make
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00786.html (14,380 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:36:03 -0400
However, my considered folded dipole or would allow me to I'd just let the wires drop 20 feet at the ends or better yet make and end loading "T". Folding the ends back with ladder line wouldn't be m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00789.html (8,800 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:07:00 -0400
antenna? As far as I perimeter wire hats. position on the Good idea. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather St
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00790.html (8,594 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:23:42 +0200
Since I have (now had) a linear loaded 160m vertical I wanted to try to measure if that loading gave any loss. So here goes: Case: 100ft vertical with linear loading 26ft up and down, resonant at 189
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00798.html (10,012 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:59:29 -0400
Mark, I was considering that option also. Frankly, I thought the linear loading would be easier, but I didn't appreciate that the losses would be so high, especially with relatively short lengths. I'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00801.html (11,672 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Modeling Ladderline as an Antenna Element (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:27:53 -0400
While that small change demonstrates loss in linear loading, the effect is really bothersome when the antenna is very short. With a long antenna, like a 100ft tall 160 antenna, you can get away with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00803.html (9,438 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu