Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+Rohn\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+Rohn\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 15:57:40 -0500; Assembly question: Does everyone work above the guywires to stack higher sections? Rohn says point blank that 25 is not self supporting "at any height" and that temporary guys should be attached as o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00103.html (7,420 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:17:29 -0500; the guys dangling from it, then connect them. up with guys dangling, actually intended for the section after that and the whole process is repeated, guying every 30', but never climbing more than on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00104.html (8,921 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:54:44 -0500; Temps. I use long ropes. You can usually tell when you are too high, it will sway some. A good sign you need a guy! Bob Assembly question: Does everyone work above the guywires to stack higher sectio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00106.html (7,792 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Robert West" <robert.west@eatmoresoap.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 16:57:49 -0500; I agree. Taking a tower down requires the same attention to safety but I, along with others I've worked with, will treat it differently. And sometimes as a speed contest. Not good. Man, you rode a 40; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00107.html (10,048 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Bill K2OWR" <k2owr@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 18:55:52 -0500; later. It was not damaged seriously. It was dumb how it happened. I was down to the last 4 sections, where the first set of guys were, and in a fit of sheer "stupid" it seemed like a good idea, as l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00108.html (11,602 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:54:48 EST; later. It was not damaged seriously. It was dumb how it happened. I was down to the last 4 sections, where the first set of guys were, and in a fit of sheer "stupid" it seemed like a good idea, as lo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00109.html (8,132 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "J. Gordon Beattie, Jr., W2TTT" <w2ttt@att.net>; Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:16:05 -0800; Bill! Cowabunga dude! Thanks & 73, Gordon Beattie, W2TTT 201.314.6964 --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill K2OWR Sen; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00113.html (13,510 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: Jim Hoge <knowkode@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 20:17:19 -0800 (PST); I don't work above a guypoint, temporary or permanent on 25G during erection or dismantling. 73 es be safe, Jim W5QM _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@c; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00114.html (7,700 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:58:26 -0500; Whether assembling or disassembling a tower, be it 25G, 45G, or plain old American Steel I never work above the guys. When each section goes up it has a set of temporary wire rope guys strong enough; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00116.html (10,146 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: k7lxc@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:39:29 EST; going to break a lot of bones if it comes down. I know this because I rode a 40' R25 down and broke my pelvis..... How did that happen? What were the circumstances? Did you follow all of the Rohn spe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00119.html (7,877 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] more Rohn (score: 1): Author: Dick NY1E <dickny1e@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 15:13:13 -0800 (PST); I've never used temporary guys except for the first sections of a tower on a pier pin. 30' of 25G is fine as long as the gin pole rope goes through a snatch block at the base of the tower. I've worke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00127.html (8,348 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:43:42 -0500; Trying again on this post... Well, I have enjoyed studying all the thoughtful replies to my questions about 25G and its installation. Thanks. Funny thing, though. I don't KNOW any more than before. S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00277.html (9,768 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:23:04 -0500; Wilson: I don't have first-hand experience with Blaw-Knox towers but I am aware that they make broadcast towers that are very sturdy. FWIW. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00280.html (11,202 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: RICHARD SOLOMON <w1ksz@q.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:51:31 +0000; Somewhere on my HD I have a copy of a page from an earlier Rohn Catalog showing the maximum permissable unguyed height vs windload. Then the Accountants and Lawyers got in the act. If I find it I wil; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00281.html (10,733 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] More Rohn (score: 1): Author: k7lxc@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:52:28 EST; drawing of a Rohn "Self Supporting Base Plate"!! do. It's obvious that 25G is a strong tower that can do way more than they say. I'm not trying to cut corners and be unsafe, but would like to know th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00285.html (9,408 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]