Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+on\s+Bobtails\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+on\s+Bobtails\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (thompson@mindspring.com); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 00:14:39 -0400; Most of us think of the Bobtail as the 3 vertical wire array fed at the bottom of the center with an LC network. Actually this is a three element or double Bobtail per designer W6BCX. The half square; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00965.html (9,212 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 08:47:05 -0400 (EDT); Dave's notes on the Bobtail are an excellent supplement to the subject. The Bobtail was "invented" first, with the half-square later, although the half square is--from the perspective of basic theory; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00971.html (9,981 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 10:29:39 -0400; I used a Bobtail years ago, the conventional three element kind. It worked OK on 75 meters, but almost never as well as two inverted V dipoles with 40 feet apex that were phased. Mine was out in the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00973.html (8,126 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: n9yxa@amsat.org (N9YXA-Cedrick Johnson); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 09:44:19 -0500; For our FD efforts, I used a Bobtail for 20CW. We had another antenna, a Double Extended Zepp, and I wasn't too pleased with it. It seems as though sigs were louder on the Bobtail than on the DEZ...; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00975.html (8,697 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 10:56:40 -0400 (EDT); Most SCVs show a very slow rate of change in the source resistance and an almost linear change in reactance across the ham band. The patterns appear not to change in any dramatic way. Hence, what so; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00977.html (8,434 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: w4zw@home.com (Jon, W4ZW); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 11:27:13 -0400; We (Tamiami Amateur Radio Club) used a bob-tail this year in our QRP effort and it worked really well. Of course being in SW Florida, the only direction we need is North. We used it here on Casey Key; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00980.html (7,929 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 15:44:12 -0400; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> worked Bzzzzt. Typo. Make that two inverted Vee dipoles at 140 feet apex on 75. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contes; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00984.html (7,863 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] More on Bobtails (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1998 23:15:07 EDT; Dang! I was already planning this killer 40 foot high antenna. Sheesh. Cheers, Steve K7LXC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrat; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00988.html (7,595 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]