Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+on\s+measuring\s+cable\s+loss\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+on\s+measuring\s+cable\s+loss\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] More on measuring cable loss (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 09:37:11 -0500; For what it's worth, I installed the two-radio switching system (anyone interested in just how many months it takes to design and build an automatic two-radio switching system, and what it takes to i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00338.html (9,545 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] More on measuring cable loss (score: 1): Author: w2vjn@rosenet.net (George Cutsogeorge); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:04:22 -0800; I have noticed that the attenuation peak moves around several dB in shorted stubs made from LMR400 when it's flexed. It must have something to do with the aluminum shield moving. There was no problem; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00339.html (7,359 bytes)
3. FW: [TowerTalk] More on measuring cable loss (score: 1): Author: W4EF@pacbell.net (Michael Tope); Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 03:54:20 -0000; Dick, If you have a good 50 ohm termination, put it at the end of the coax run and measure the input return loss of the system as a function of frequency. I think you will find that the "anomalies" i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00421.html (10,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]