Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+tower\s+concerns\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:39:57 EST
660# ACTUALLY there is another 8 sq.ft. of tower capacity available that was netted out for a symmetrical commercial antenna mount in the general notes. Take a look. So the above example will take 24
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00428.html (9,339 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:40:02 -0500
I disagree, Steve. I don't think it means it cannot be done. Instead, I think it likely means that Rohn didn't think this was a likely installation. I'm sure that the Rohn tower materials are capable
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00460.html (8,816 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:15:11 EST
Huh? How do you figure that? When "you run off the tables in the catalog" you're doing something the manufacturer does not recommend. You will be violating the LXC Prime Directive of "DOing what the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00462.html (8,105 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:48:25 -0500
No one has their guys or brackets placed EXACTLY as shown in the catalog. Each installation has to be adapted to the environment it's placed in. Not necessarily. You may be doing something the manufa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00467.html (9,163 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: johnfarr@ro.com (John D. Farr)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:31:41 -0600
Steve: I checked my catalog, and there is no "Prime Directive" mentioned anywhere in it. Instead, I find quite detailed engineering specifications on the tower legs, tower braces and the tower sectio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00477.html (8,092 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: johnfarr@ro.com (John D. Farr)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:31:44 -0600
Or be one. John KC4ZXX snip snip If you don't hire an expert, then you better be lucky.... -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00478.html (7,530 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] More tower concerns (score: 1)
Author: w7ni@teleport.com (Stan or Patricia Griffiths)
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:00:33 -0800
Normally, I fully support Steve and his conservative position on tower installations. What I DON'T believe is that Rohn has "super-engineers" that are somehow vastly superior to other PE's in the wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00480.html (11,665 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu