- 1. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: Daniel Hileman <n9wx_dan@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 21:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
- Hi Everyone, Thanks for all that responded on my earlier question...well, I have come across a deal...I have the opportunity to purchase a Mosley Pro-67B....it would be at 65'...I know, not optimum f
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00048.html (7,297 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: "Bernard(wtrone)" <wtrone@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 06:18:49 -0500
- Daniel: About 11 years ago, I bought a 67B shortly after they came out. To make a very long story short, I had nothing but trouble with it. The problem was high VSWR and low Front -to- Rear. I could
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00051.html (9,464 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: Tom Anderson <ww5l@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:23:34 -0500 (CDT)
- Daniuel: You should have no problems with the Pro67B at 65 feet. I used to have a Mosley Classic 33 WARC with the TA40KR 40m kit which meant I had a 40m rotatable dipole at 50 feet and it worked fine
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00057.html (10,607 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: Daniel Hileman <n9wx_dan@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 08:52:46 -0700 (PDT)
- Hi Everyone, Well, thanks for all the replies, Pro and against the Pro67B...Let me explain what my plan is...I have a Trylon Titan tower that will put the 205CA at about 60' and the Hy-gain 7-2 at ab
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00063.html (8,737 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: <paul@w8aef.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:55:21 -0000
- While at XZ0A I worked several hams in Phoenix on 40m, the loudest was using a Pro-67 at 72 feet. And all the Phoenix hams were running similar power. de Paul, W8AEF _________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00064.html (9,492 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro-67B (score: 1)
- Author: "Frank Donovan" <donovanf@erols.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:57:43 -0400
- Dan, One bit of advice: Builders of multi-tower stations too often neglect the significant degradation caused by interactions between antennas for the same band on collocated towers. This issue was c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00073.html (11,334 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu