Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+Pro\s+56\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+Pro\s+56\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 56? (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 21:36:57 -0400; What's the general consuses on the Pro 56. A local ham is going to part with one (been up about 3 years) and a never used PST-71 Rotator. They are big and heavy, but are they any good...compared to m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00475.html (6,438 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 56? (score: 1): Author: "bob" <wf3h@vsswireless.net>; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 06:12:44 -0500; I've had one for 16 years....really love it. It's a champion on 20 meters, but not so hot on 10. Mine has 2 elements on 40 which is a real advantage. Been contesting with Frankford Radio club for yea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00476.html (7,929 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley Pro 56? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 18:56:15 EDT; with one (been up about 3 years) and a never used PST-71 Rotator. They are big and heavy, but are they any good...compared to my old TH-5? No. The PRO Mosleys are underwhelming performers. They are g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00484.html (7,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]