Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+S\-402\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 21:45:54 -0600
Here is a testimonial from a friend who wishes to remain annonymous. Tom N4KG I have had a Mosley S-402 since 1985. Originally had it at 85 feet at my old QTH, and gave it its first run in CQWW CW th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00246.html (7,678 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: BobK8IA@aol.com (BobK8IA@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 05:34:22 EDT
Here's my two cents re the Mosley S-402. Mine was purchased new in 1972 and had it up until I became inactive in ham radio, about 1986-7. I am a "90% CW type" and it played quite well for a reduced s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00247.html (7,950 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Martin <tmartin@chartermi.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:17:47 -0500
For the second time I've had a broken element support issue. The first time a F1 tornado came through and I lost half of the reflector. A few weeks ago, a 45 mph wind gust took off half of the driven
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00394.html (7,331 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:34:34 -0400
I have no personal experience with Mosley. It is not necessary to insulate the parasitic elements however doing so makes calculating the lengths much easier as there is no boom/bracket compensation.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00400.html (8,420 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 05:54:13 -0500
I would use about 4 Stauff clamps on either side of the center of the element on an aluminum plate that was about 5" X 24" X 3/8". 73... Stan, K5GO _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00401.html (8,318 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:25:33 +0000 (UTC)
In this case John, it is necessary as I believe that model uses center loaded elements there at the boom to element mount, so he will need to follow Stan's and your advice advice and and locate somet
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00403.html (9,390 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:54:53 -0400
I just looked at a photo and was I suprised to see that you are correct, the elements are loaded right at the boom. Isn't this the least efficient spot for a loading coil? John KK9A _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00404.html (9,944 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:33:22 -0700
I would use about 4 Stauff clamps on either side of the center of the element on an aluminum plate that was about 5" X 24" X 3/8". 73... Stan, K5GO get channel in 3 inch and also 5 inch wide..and eve
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00405.html (9,872 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:40:46 -0700
I just looked at a photo and was I surprised to see that you are correct, the elements are loaded right at the boom. Isn't this the least efficient spot for a loading coil? John KK9A inductance is do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00414.html (10,743 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Mosley S-402 (score: 1)
Author: Tom Martin <tmartin@chartermi.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:04:47 -0500
The Stauff clamps look like the best approach. I will also use an insert (fiberglass rod, or a hardwood dowel that has been waterproofed) between the element halves where they join the coil. This has
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-03/msg00416.html (7,791 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu